Restaurant Law Center Files Petition with U.S. Supreme Court in National Restaurant Association

Published on : Friday, January 20, 2017

national-restaurant-association-logoToday, the Restaurant Law Center is leading the effort of asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a case, National Restaurant Association, et al. v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al., brought by the National Restaurant Association, the Alaska Cabaret, Hotel,

 

Restaurant and Retailers Association, the Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association, and the Washington Hospitality Association. The case challenges the Department of Labor’s anti tip-pooling stance that prevents cooks and dishwashers from receiving tips.

 

 

“The Department of Labor has completely overstepped its regulatory authority and is unfairly discriminating against those restaurant employees who work in the back-of-the-house,” stated Angelo Amador, Executive Director of the Restaurant Law Center. “The law here is clear: employees who earn above minimum wage should be able to share their tips with fellow employees, no matter where they work. The Department of Labor cannot continue to trample on the rights of restaurant workers.”

 

 

The Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) tip credit regulations prevent front-of-the-house restaurant employees from sharing tips with back-of-the-house employees if the employer takes a tip credit, meaning some employees earn a tip wage. However, the Department of Labor has now expanded the tip credit regulations, without Congressional action, and is refusing to allow employees to share tips even if the employer does not take a tip credit. This violates the clear language of the law and the intent of the law.

 

 

“The Labor Department’s 2011 regulation barring tip pools that include kitchen staff is contrary to the plain language of the FLSA,” stated Paul DeCamp, attorney of record on the case. “The Ninth Circuit’s ruling conflicts with not only the Fourth Circuit’s interpretation of the statutory language, but with the interpretation that the Ninth Circuit itself gave in its 2010 decision in Cumbie v. Woody Woo, Inc. It is incumbent on the U.S. Supreme Court to render a decision on this matter against the Department of Labor’s regulatory overstep.”

 

 

The original case, Oregon Restaurant Association, et al. v. Perez, et al., was filed after the Department of Labor issued new regulations that barred tip pools from including kitchen staff in response to the Ninth Circuit 2010 decision in Cumbie v. Woody Woo, Inc., which upheld the right to run a tip pool that includes kitchen employees in certain circumstances.

 

 

 

Source:- National Restaurant Association

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

arrow2Follow TTW
 
facebook-logo  twitter-logo  LinkedIn_logo  stumbleupon-logo   rss_logo 
ttw_blogger_logo  ttw_blogger_logo  ttw_blogger_logo

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 02 WTM London 2018
  • 03 imexamerica 2018
  • 07 miltcongress 2018
  • 08 theleisureshow 18
  • 09 cibtm 2018
  • 09 Seatrade Cruise Med 2018
  • 10 ITE-HCMC 2018
  • 13 aite 2018
  • 15 TravelDaily TDC 18
  • 16 OTDYKH 2018
  • 17 Hotel Show dubai 18
  • 18 hospitalityqatar 18
  • 18 Hotel Management Asia Summit 2018
  • 18 thincindonesia 2018
  • 19 bricsaconsulting 2018
  • 20 CITE_TTW 2018
  • 20 europecongress 18
  • 20 sahicsouthamerica 2018
  • 21 bitmchina 2018
  • 22 Hotel Management Singapore Summit 18
  • 23 PTM 2018
  • 30 PATA

TRAVEL INDUSTRY EVENTS

Get our toolbar!
Review www.travelandtourworld.com on alexa.com