American Airlines Under Investigation For Misleading Passengers On London To Chicago Delay, With Maintenance Issues Exposing Gaps In UK261 Compliance

Published on August 5, 2025

American Airlines Under Fire for Misleading Flight Delay Attribution and Denial of Compensation

American Airlines (AA) is currently facing scrutiny following a flight delay involving its route from London Heathrow (LHR) to Chicago O’Hare (ORD), which led to a missed connection to Miami International (MIA). Initially, the airline blamed air traffic control for the delay, but flight records reveal that maintenance issues were the root cause, highlighting a troubling case that touches on the airline’s responsibility under UK261, a regulation that mandates compensation for delays caused by airline-controlled factors.

The Incident

The dispute centers around American Airlines flight AA91, which was scheduled to travel from London Heathrow (LHR) to Chicago O’Hare (ORD). The aircraft, N842AA, was delayed due to a maintenance issue while operating flight AA98 the previous day. As a result, passengers missed their connecting flight to Miami International (MIA), extending their arrival time by nearly 10 hours.

Instead of acknowledging the maintenance problem, American Airlines’ customer service team attributed the delay to air traffic control issues such as ground holds and congestion. Despite the availability of clear documentation indicating that the delay stemmed from maintenance, the airline rejected the passenger’s compensation request, citing external factors instead.

The Discrepancy in the Airline’s Statement

In response to the incident, American Airlines claimed that flight AA91 was delayed by 81 minutes due to air traffic control issues and that any maintenance work conducted was done “opportunistically” during the delay. However, flight records and the timeline of events do not align with this explanation. The maintenance delay the previous day caused a cascading effect, resulting in the aircraft’s late arrival and a chain of scheduling disruptions, including the missed connection to Miami.

The passenger, armed with evidence, pointed out the irregularities in the airline’s account. The aircraft’s rotation, involving flights AA2012, AA2321, and AA98, all experienced delays the day before, showing a clear disruption to the flight schedule. The passenger was able to prove that the delay was directly tied to unresolved maintenance issues, which led to the subsequent delays and missed connections.

Moreover, internal records from American Airlines supported the passenger’s claim, as the airline’s notes indicated that the delay was caused by maintenance, contradicting the official external statement. This conflicting information raises concerns that the airline may have intentionally misrepresented the cause of the delay in an attempt to avoid compensating the affected passenger.

Legal and Ethical Implications

Under UK261 regulations, passengers are entitled to compensation if delays are caused by issues within the airline’s control, such as maintenance. While air traffic control disruptions, weather, and other extraordinary circumstances may exempt airlines from paying compensation, these situations must be properly documented.

In this case, American Airlines’ attempt to shift the blame to air traffic control, despite clear evidence of a maintenance delay, calls into question whether the airline is fully complying with consumer protection laws. The airline’s vague explanations and refusal to acknowledge the actual cause of the delay raise serious concerns about the airline’s approach to handling delay claims and its commitment to passenger rights.

Furthermore, the delayed responses and contradictory messaging from American’s claims team suggest a deliberate effort to stall claims, deny compensation using ambiguous rules, and hope that passengers will give up in frustration. This practice is becoming increasingly common among major airlines, leading to a larger issue in the industry.

Broader Industry Implications

Unfortunately, American Airlines’ handling of this situation is not unique. Many airlines use similar tactics to minimize payouts under EU and UK aviation laws. Passengers often face significant barriers when attempting to secure compensation, even when they are clearly entitled to it. This widespread issue has led to the rise of third-party claim agencies that help travelers navigate the complex process of obtaining compensation.

In this particular case, the presence of accurate internal flight data makes it difficult for American Airlines to justify its actions. The airline’s attempts to downplay its accountability are especially troubling, given the substantial evidence supporting the passenger’s claim. It is concerning to see major airlines sidestepping their responsibilities, despite overwhelming documentation that would support compensation.

Advice for Travelers

Travelers who experience flight delays are encouraged to carefully document all relevant information and remain persistent in filing claims. It is crucial for passengers to keep records of flight times, maintenance issues, and any communication with the airline. If necessary, travelers should escalate their claims to the appropriate national enforcement bodies to ensure their rights are upheld.

As this case demonstrates, even when rules and regulations are clear, passengers often find it challenging to secure compensation. Therefore, it is essential to be proactive in seeking compensation and to be aware of consumer protection laws that are designed to safeguard travelers.

Conclusion

This case highlights the growing challenges travelers face when attempting to receive compensation for delays caused by factors within an airline’s control. As American Airlines continues to face scrutiny for its handling of this delay, it serves as a reminder for all airlines to uphold their responsibilities to passengers and to ensure transparency in their operations. For now, passengers are advised to stay informed, document their claims thoroughly, and remain persistent in holding airlines accountable for delays that fall within their control.

Stay connected with the latest aviation news. Follow us on social media for more updates and join our Telegram group for real-time information. Subscribe to our Google News updates for the most current developments in the aviation industry.