Bangkok, Phuket, and Chiang Mai To Face Travel Chaos as Thailand Cuts Visa-Free Stay: What Travellers Need to Know about This New Rule

Published on March 19, 2025

Thailand’s tourism industry was bracing for a significant shift after officials announced plans to reduce visa-free stays from 60 days to 30 days. The government had argued that the move was necessary to curb widespread misuse of the visa waiver program, particularly by individuals engaging in unauthorized business activities. However, travel analysts warned that the abrupt change could lead to disruptions in tourism, impacting long-term visitors, digital nomads, and even Thailand’s hospitality sector.

The decision had been met with mixed reactions, as industry stakeholders acknowledged the government’s concerns while also raising alarms about the potential negative effects on inbound tourism. As authorities continued to work on refining the new policy, the uncertainty surrounding its implementation had already started creating unease among travelers and businesses alike.

Why Thailand is Tightening Its Visa Policy

Government officials had justified the new visa rule by pointing to increasing cases of foreigners using the extended 60-day visa-free stay to conduct business operations without proper authorization. Reports had emerged that some travelers were exploiting the policy to rent out condominium units illegally, effectively bypassing regulations meant to protect Thailand’s hospitality industry.

Under the current system, passport holders from 93 countries had been eligible for visa-free entry into Thailand for up to 60 days, a measure that had been introduced in July 2024 to boost post-pandemic tourism recovery. While this extended stay had initially been welcomed, authorities had since determined that it was being misused, prompting the need for stricter oversight.

By shortening the duration to 30 days, the Thai government expected to:

• Deter individuals from conducting unauthorized business activities.
• Protect the local hospitality sector from illegal rental competition.
• Ensure that the visa-free waiver remains focused on short-term tourism.

While authorities remained firm on the policy change, travel experts had cautioned that the decision might have unintended consequences, particularly for long-term visitors who contributed significantly to the Thai economy.

How This Could Trigger a Tourism Slowdown

Tourism professionals had pointed out that while the policy aimed to curb violations, it might also deter legitimate long-term tourists, including retirees, digital nomads, and seasonal travelers. Many visitors who had previously opted for extended stays in Thailand—particularly those from Europe and North America—might reconsider their plans due to the reduced timeframe.

Industry analysts had highlighted several risks associated with the new visa rule:

• Decline in Long-Term Visitors: Many travelers preferred extended stays in Thailand, especially during winter months, and might now shift to other destinations with more flexible visa policies.
• Increased Processing Delays: If long-term visitors needed to apply for additional extensions or alternative visas, immigration offices could face a surge in applications, leading to administrative backlogs.
• Economic Impact on Local Businesses: Restaurants, hotels, co-working spaces, and service providers that catered to long-term visitors might experience reduced demand.

While Thailand’s short-term tourism sector—particularly holidaymakers on brief visits—was unlikely to be affected, the policy shift could erode Thailand’s appeal among those who had traditionally contributed to the country’s economy over extended periods.

Global Impact: How Travelers May Reroute Their Plans

With uncertainty looming over Thailand’s visa regulations, travel experts had suggested that international travelers might start re-evaluating their choices when planning long-term stays in Southeast Asia. Destinations with more flexible visa policies, such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and Vietnam, could benefit from Thailand’s revised rules.

Several global implications were expected:

• Shift in Digital Nomad Travel Patterns: Thailand had long been a top choice for remote workers, but the 30-day limit might push them to consider Bali, Kuala Lumpur, or Ho Chi Minh City instead.
• More Frequent Border Runs: Travelers seeking to extend their stay might resort to multiple border crossings, increasing the workload on immigration authorities and airlines.
• Impact on Airline and Hospitality Demand: Airlines serving long-haul routes to Thailand could see fluctuations in demand, particularly if long-term visitors opted for alternative destinations.

While Thailand’s tourism authorities had reassured travelers that the changes were meant to balance economic benefits with regulatory control, the uncertainty surrounding the transition had already begun affecting travel sentiment among those considering extended trips.

Security and Financial Concerns for the Tourism Sector

The visa policy change had not emerged in isolation. Travel analysts had pointed out that Thailand’s tourism industry was already facing multiple challenges, including:

• Security Concerns Among Chinese Tourists: Safety issues had been a growing concern, with some tourists expressing hesitancy about traveling to Thailand due to reports of scams and criminal incidents.
• Weaker Purchasing Power Among European and North American Travelers: Economic downturns and rising travel costs had led to budget constraints for many long-haul tourists, affecting spending patterns.

Given these pre-existing challenges, some industry experts had questioned whether the timing of the visa-free stay reduction was ideal. While authorities had remained focused on preventing misuse, they had also been urged to consider the broader economic repercussions of their decision.

What Travelers Should Expect Next

For now, travelers planning extended stays in Thailand had been advised to monitor updates from Thai immigration authorities regarding the official implementation date of the new visa rule. The transition was expected to bring changes in visa application procedures, and travelers might need to explore alternative visa options if they intended to stay beyond 30 days.

As the tourism sector adjusted to this shift, industry stakeholders were anticipating further clarifications from Thai officials on how the policy would be enforced. Whether the visa-free stay reduction would successfully curb illegal business activities without harming legitimate tourism remained a key question—one that the travel industry would be watching closely in the months ahead.