Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem confirms the U.S. travel ban is expanding to over thirty countries.

Published on December 6, 2025

A seismic shift in U.S. travel policy is officially underway. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem has confirmed the widely rumored expansion of the country’s controversial travel ban, indicating the list of affected nations will balloon from 19 to more than 30 countries. This decisive move, announced during an appearance on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle,” is poised to create widespread global instability and spark heated debate over national security versus international mobility, threatening to reshape inbound tourism for years to come.

Secretary Noem, while declining to specify the exact new additions, stated, “I won’t be specific on the number, but it’s over 30, and the president is continuing to evaluate countries.” The expansion follows intensified calls for stricter immigration measures after a recent fatal shooting in Washington, D.C., allegedly involving an Afghan national who had been resettled in the United States. Though Afghanistan is already included in the existing restrictions, the incident has fueled the administration’s commitment to a broader policy crackdown.

The Security Imperative: Vetting and Instability

Homeland Security officials are framing this massive expansion as a critical national security measure. Their stated goal is to prevent the entry of individuals they deem dangerous by targeting nations that, in the administration’s view, lack the governmental stability or capacity to provide the necessary information for thorough vetting.

As Secretary Noem put it, the core question guiding the expansion is: “If they don’t have a stable government there, if they don’t have a country that can sustain itself and tell us who those individuals are and help us vet them, why should we allow people from that country to come here to the United States?”

This criterion suggests that the new additions will focus on conflict-affected nations, those with limited state control over their territory, or countries with strained diplomatic ties that impede information-sharing agreements. An internal State Department cable, previously acquired by Reuters, had indicated the administration was considering banning travelers from as many as 36 different countries, aligning with the “over 30” figure confirmed by Noem.

The Far-Reaching Impact on Global Travel

The current U.S. travel ban already restricts entry for nationals from 19 countries, including prominent nations like Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Iran, and Haiti. The restrictions vary, with some nations facing a complete block on all visa categories (immigrant and non-immigrant), while others face partial restrictions on specific visa types, such as tourist or student visas.

Adding over a dozen new countries—potentially reaching a total nearing 50 nations—will have significant and immediate repercussions on the global travel landscape:

• Inbound Tourism Plunge: A broader ban will inevitably reduce the number of legitimate international travelers, including tourists, students, and business professionals, from dozens of countries. This will translate directly into lost revenue for airlines, hotels, tour operators, and the entire U.S. tourism sector, which relies heavily on international visitors.
• Visa Uncertainty and Instability: For the travel industry, stability is paramount. The abrupt and dramatic change in U.S. entry rules creates massive visa uncertainty, discouraging potential visitors from non-banned nations as well. Travelers may reasonably fear that their own country could be suddenly added to the list, leading them to choose alternative destinations with more predictable policies.
• Global Events in Peril: The timing is particularly sensitive as the United States prepares to host major global events, including the 2026 FIFA World Cup (co-hosted with Canada and Mexico) and upcoming Olympics and Paralympics, as well as the America250 celebrations. While the ban often contains specific exemptions for athletes and official delegations, it directly impacts hundreds of thousands of fans, family members, and non-essential personnel. Countries like Iran and Haiti, which have qualified for the World Cup, already face severe challenges in getting their fans to the U.S. for matches. The addition of more soccer-crazed nations could drain the energy and revenue that host cities are counting on.

A Humanitarian and Economic Crossroads

Critics of the expansion argue that this wide-net policy casts an indiscriminate shadow over entire nationalities. Humanitarian groups fear the impact on refugees and asylum-seekers, arguing that the ban conflates desperate individuals seeking safety with genuine national security threats. The move is viewed by many as a sweeping and punitive action that disproportionately affects citizens from conflict-affected or economically challenged nations, potentially worsening diplomatic relationships.

The administration’s promise to “permanently pause” migration from all “Third World Countries,” a term used by President Trump in the wake of the D.C. shooting, further signals a shift toward a more isolationist and restrictive immigration stance, one that threatens to undermine the spirit of global exchange and cooperation.

As the DHS prepares to formally announce the full list of new countries, the travel industry must brace for significant turbulence. The expansion represents a dramatic escalation of immigration enforcement that will impact not just who can enter the country, but the U.S.’s reputation as a welcoming, open, and reliable host on the global stage.