Published on December 5, 2025

The foundational stability of Indian aviation was profoundly shaken in early December when the largest domestic carrier, IndiGo, was confronted by an unprecedented flight cancellation crisis. This operational breakdown, which spanned several days, resulted in widespread chaos across major airports and necessitated immediate intervention by the government. A complex combination of internal planning deficiencies, new regulatory requirements, and technical difficulties coalesced, leading to a massive disruption of services.
The severe impact on passenger movement and the ensuing regulatory scrutiny transformed what might have been a routine scheduling difficulty into a critical situation demanding national attention. The gravity of the situation was underscored by the direct involvement of the Ministry of Civil Aviation and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), who were compelled to institute stringent oversight measures to manage the escalating turmoil.
The scale of the service disruption quickly escalated, moving from a troubling anomaly to a full-blown national fiasco within a few days. The crisis reached its zenith on Friday, December 5, 2025, when the total number of affected flights exceeded one thousand across the carrier’s network. This staggering figure represented an operational collapse previously unseen by the airline. It was reported that over 400 flights were cancelled on this single day alone, following an earlier count of more than 550 cancellations recorded the previous day, December 4. The initial wave of disruptions, starting around December 2, saw the airline’s operational efficiency begin a sharp, downward trajectory.
The most telling metric of the crisis was the sharp decline in the airline’s On-Time Performance (OTP). This critical benchmark, which measures punctuality across six major metro airports—namely Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Chennai, Kolkata, and Hyderabad—was observed plummeting to a dismal 8.5% on December 4. Such a dramatic fall in operational reliability not only signified internal disarray but also directly affected thousands of travel plans nationwide. The cancellation figures, which were heavily concentrated at major hubs such as Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport, Bengaluru’s Kempegowda International Airport (KIA), Mumbai, and Hyderabad, demonstrated that the operational issues were systemic and nationwide, not merely regional isolated incidents.
Advertisement
The primary catalyst for the widespread disruptions was officially identified as a confluence of factors, central among which were significant pilot-rostering issues and deep-seated planning deficiencies. The management of IndiGo acknowledged that miscalculations and planning lapses had occurred during the phased roll-out of new aviation safety protocols, specifically Phase 2 of the Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL) rules. These new regulations, which govern the working hours of flight crew to ensure safety and mitigate fatigue, required a greater number of pilots than the airline had strategically anticipated or effectively rostered.
It was widely understood that the airline’s previously successful lean manpower strategy was fundamentally exposed by the stricter FDTL norms. The necessary adjustments to crew scheduling were not adequately or promptly executed, resulting in a severe shortage of available pilots compliant with the new rules. Further compounding the problem, the airline cited a multitude of unforeseen operational challenges, which included minor technology glitches in the crew-allocation software, essential schedule changes linked to the busy winter season, adverse weather conditions, and increased congestion within the overall aviation system.
Advertisement
The direct consequence of the operational failure was immediately felt by the travelling public, whose collective experience was defined by frustration and severe inconvenience. Thousands of passengers were stranded at major airports across the country, with many experiencing delays stretching beyond twelve hours. Scenes of chaotic turmoil were widely reported, with long queues forming at check-in and cancellation counters, often without adequate communication or support from airline staff.
At numerous terminals, including Bengaluru and Delhi, the immense frustration of stranded travellers boiled over, resulting in public protests demanding immediate answers, refunds, or alternate travel arrangements. The lack of proactive communication from the airline regarding real-time flight status compounded the distress, leaving passengers waiting for extended periods, sometimes overnight, without access to basic amenities like sufficient food or water. Beyond the immediate inconvenience, the cancellations had a ripple effect across the entire travel ecosystem. Many airports reported instances of misplaced or delayed baggage, adding another layer of complexity and suffering for the travellers.
The severity of the crisis quickly warranted formal intervention by the Government of India. The Ministry of Civil Aviation promptly ordered a high-level inquiry into the widespread disruption. This probe was mandated to meticulously examine the underlying causes of the operational meltdown, identify areas of accountability, and recommend robust measures to prevent any recurrence of such passenger hardship in the future.
The DGCA, the principal regulatory body, convened a terse emergency meeting with the airline’s management. During this meeting, the regulator directed the airline to immediately stabilize operations and provide a clear, actionable roadmap for recovery. Specific directives were issued, including a requirement for regular updates on crew hiring and training schedules, along with mandatory roster restructuring. Crucially, a temporary ban on fare hikes was enforced during the stabilization period to protect consumers from the consequences of reduced capacity. To ensure real-time monitoring of the situation and provide effective support for affected passengers, a dedicated 24×7 control room was established by the Civil Aviation Ministry. A four-member committee was also constituted by the regulator to conduct a comprehensive review of the circumstances that led to the extensive operational disruption, reinforcing the government’s commitment to restoring order and passenger confidence in the sector.
Following the regulatory crackdown and the full realization of the crisis’s scope, a concerted effort was made by IndiGo management to apologize and articulate a path toward operational recovery. Pieter Elbers, the CEO of IndiGo, issued an apology, acknowledging the massive inconvenience caused to customers and stakeholders. A strategic decision was made to execute a complete reboot of the airline’s operational systems and schedules, which was expected to result in the highest number of cancellations yet on December 5, but was deemed necessary for progressive future improvement.
In the immediate term, the airline advised passengers whose flights had been cancelled to avoid proceeding to the airports and offered assurances of automatic full refunds and fee waivers for re-scheduling travel booked within the affected period (December 5–15). Operational measures were also introduced to support stranded passengers, including the provision of hotel rooms, transport, food, and lounge access for vulnerable groups.
Advertisement
Saturday, December 6, 2025
Saturday, December 6, 2025
Saturday, December 6, 2025
Saturday, December 6, 2025
Saturday, December 6, 2025
Saturday, December 6, 2025
Saturday, December 6, 2025
Saturday, December 6, 2025