Qatar Airways Joins Emirates, Etihad, FlyDubai, and Saudia All Face Major Emergency Landings: As New Reports Unveil

Published on December 27, 2025

King Khalid International Airport (KKIA) is a key hub for Saudi Arabia’s capital. Emergencies are rare, but between January 2022 and December 2025 a few flights made unscheduled or emergency landings in Riyadh. These episodes — a cargo undershoot, a false warning, a security scare, a bomb threat and a medical crisis — show how flight crews and Saudi authorities responded quickly when unexpected situations arose.

2022: Cargo aircraft undershoot

On 15 January 2022 a Maximus Air Antonov An‑124 freighter approaching KKIA declared an emergency due to engine fluctuations. The aircraft touched down about 172 metres short of runway 15L, damaging approach lights and its own landing gear. Fire‑rescue teams extinguished small fires and towed the aircraft away; no injuries occurred. Saudi accident investigators opened an inquiry with their Ukrainian counterparts but were limited because the crew departed before data recorders could be retrieved. The rapid response prevented the mishap from escalating.

2023: Routine operations

There were no publicly reported emergency landings at KKIA in 2023 despite an increase in flights. The absence of incidents suggests that established safety systems and training were effective.

2024: False alarm and security alert

PIA Hajj flight PK 839

On 31 May 2024 Pakistan International Airlines flight PK 839, carrying pilgrims from Karachi to Jeddah, received a cargo‑hold temperature warning. The pilots diverted to Riyadh as a precaution. After landing the passengers were off‑loaded and engineers inspected the aircraft, only to find the warning was false. PIA thanked Saudi officials for their cooperation and emphasised that safety procedures had been followed. The event demonstrates how even a faulty sensor triggers an emergency response during a high‑traffic period.

IndiGo flight 6E 74

On 16 October 2024 IndiGo flight 6E 74 left Riyadh for Mumbai. Soon after take‑off the airline received a message suggesting a bomb on board. The captain diverted to Muscat, where the Airbus landed safely and passengers were evacuated while authorities searched the aircraft. The threat proved to be a hoax. IndiGo stressed that diverting was necessary to protect passengers and crew. Although the unscheduled landing occurred in Oman, the incident originated at KKIA and underscored the importance of protocols for security alerts.

2025: Bomb threat and medical emergency

Air India flight AI 114

On 22 June 2025 Air India flight AI 114 from Birmingham to Delhi was threatened by an email claiming a bomb was on board. The airline consulted authorities and diverted the Boeing 787 to Riyadh. Saudi air‑traffic controllers granted emergency clearance, and the jet landed without incident. Passengers were escorted into the terminal while specialists searched the aircraft; nothing suspicious was found. Air India thanked Saudi agencies for their help and dispatched another aircraft to take passengers onward. The diversion showed KKIA’s role as a safe harbour for flights facing threats.

Flydubai flight FZ 1125

Another emergency occurred on 24 September 2025. Flydubai flight FZ 1125 from Dubai to Tel Aviv reported that an Israeli passenger had suffered a severe stroke. The crew requested the nearest suitable airport, and Riyadh granted clearance. After landing, Saudi medical teams boarded, stabilised the passenger and transferred them to a hospital. Israeli officials publicly thanked Saudi Arabia for its adherence to international aviation conventions, and Flydubai praised the professionalism of Riyadh’s responders. Because the two countries lacked formal diplomatic relations, the episode drew international attention. For KKIA, it highlighted that humanitarian considerations override politics.

Lessons and conclusions

The five cases above reveal how Riyadh manages aviation emergencies. Crews reacted promptly to unusual situations by declaring emergencies or diverting. KKIA’s controllers and ground teams responded quickly, whether by extinguishing fires, preparing isolation bays, or deploying medical personnel. Airlines and officials issued statements to inform the public and reassure travellers. International cooperation was crucial: Pakistani authorities worked with Saudi officials on the Hajj diversion; Indian regulators coordinated during the bomb threat and security alert; and the Flydubai case involved Israeli diplomats. None of the incidents caused fatalities or severe injuries. Riyadh’s relatively small number of emergency landings and the measured responses to each suggest a robust safety culture. As air traffic grows, these experiences underscore the need for vigilance, clear protocols and collaboration so that unexpected events remain rare and are resolved safely.

Reference List

1. FlightGlobal – Investigative report on the Antonov An‑124 undershoot at Riyadh (15 Jan 2022).
2. The News International – Report on PIA flight PK 839’s emergency landing at Riyadh due to a false cargo‑hold temperature warning (31 May 2024).
3. Dunya News – Additional details on PIA’s emergency landing and passenger handling (31 May 2024).
4. The Indian Express – Coverage of multiple bomb threats including IndiGo flight 6E 74, quoting the airline’s statement about the diversion to Muscat (16 Oct 2024).
5. The Economic Times – IndiGo statement on flight 6E 74’s diversion to Muscat after a security alert (16 Oct 2024).
6. NDTV – Air India statement on AI 114’s diversion to Riyadh following a bomb threat, describing safe landing and passenger evacuation (22 Jun 2025).
7. Times of India – Article detailing Flydubai flight FZ 1125’s medical emergency landing in Riyadh and responses from Israeli and Saudi officials (24 Sep 2025).

Times of Israel – Further account of Flydubai flight FZ 1125’s emergency landing in Riyadh and passenger evacuation (25 Sep 2025).