San Francisco hotel rooms to shelter homeless people

Thursday, April 16, 2020

The local lawmakers in San Francisco have given the Mayor 12 days to secure 7,000 hotel rooms to house the homeless population of the city during the coronavirus emergency, plus another 1,250 rooms for health frontline workers.

The emergency ordinance passed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors requires Mayor London Breed to secure the rooms by April 26, and asks her to use emergency powers to commandeer the rooms if she is unable to reach deals with hotel owners.

The vote was taken via videoconference, was a rebuke to what has until now been the mayor’s more moderated strategy to place only the city’s most vulnerable homeless people in hotel rooms. The legislation highlights the ongoing challenges that San Francisco and other cities face in managing large homeless populations whose susceptibility to COVID-19 threatens broader efforts to contain the spread of the virus.

As of Tuesday, San Francisco had leased about 2,000 hotel rooms but filled fewer than half. It was prioritizing rooms for homeless people older than 60 or those with underlying health conditions that put them at greater risk of death should they contract COVID-19.

Breed has resisted calls for a wider policy of providing hotel rooms to all or most of the estimated 8,000 people living on San Francisco’s streets or in shelters, saying the logistics would be overwhelming.

But the unanimous vote requiring her to do so came just hours after city health officials released updated figures on a massive coronavirus cluster that infected a majority of the people staying at the city’s largest homeless shelter, known as MSC-South.

More than 100 shelter guests and staff tested positive, and the city’s public health director said “many of them have chronic conditions and are vulnerable to getting very sick or even dying.”

The coronavirus outbreak forced city officials to rush shelter residents to hotels where they could self-quarantine, and in the cases of those infected, recover under constant monitoring.

Several members of the Board of Supervisors in San Francisco said the city had failed to heed warnings that “congregate” shelters such as MSC-South were fertile ground for the spread of the virus.

“I am sorry,” said Supervisor Dean Preston, addressing shelter residents directly, “that after weeks of warnings, only the confirmed outbreak in your shelters spurred action from all of us.”

Advocates for the homeless had been calling on the city to empty its shelters in favor of hotel rooms for weeks.

But until Tuesday’s vote, Breed and city health and homelessness officials had been adamant that trying to house all of San Francisco’s unhoused population in hotels was impractical, and could be counterproductive.

Breed said during a media briefing on Monday it’s not as easy as everyone would like to think. She also said that managing the roughly 750 homeless people the city had already placed in rooms was requiring hundreds of staff to conduct wellness checks, manage behavioral crises, provide transportation, and meals.

The mayors of other California cities have expressed similar concerns about the challenge of moving large numbers of homeless people into hotels, even as they’ve said doing so remains a goal. In Los Angeles, Mayor Eric Garcetti said his staff was working to secure more rooms. It had about 1,700 as of this week and was continuing to negotiate with hotel owners.

Though the economic shutdown has left most hotels empty, some owners have refused to offer their properties to house the homeless, leading some advocates to call on mayors to use emergency powers to seize the properties.

« Back to Page

• Germany puts visa rejection appeals on hold for Türkiye, China and Morocco

• Macau imposes stringent COVID-19 rules

• Outbound Chinese tourists travel sees huge drop in post pandemic

• Tourism in Cologne: Recovery and normalisation in the 2nd half of 2021

• More than 5,000 flights have been cancelled worldwide this Christmas weekend