Sikkim’s New Fifty Rupees Tourist Entry Fee Sparks Controversy Amid Concerns Over Travel Costs and Tourism Growth

Written By: Anirban Bhattacharya

Anirban Bhattacharya

I am a Content Writer at Travel And Tour World, where I have been covering the global travel and tourism industry since June 2024. With five years of experience in digital journalism and SEO-focused content, I specialize in reporting on travel, tourism, aviation, hospitality, railways, and international developments. My work is built on thorough research, fact-checking, and clear, reader-focused reporting that transforms complex industry updates into accurate and accessible news. I am committed to producing credible, informative, and timely content that helps travelers and industry professionals stay informed about the latest trends, destinations, policies, and developments shaping the global travel landscape.

See Full Bio

March 17, 2025 19:56 GMT+5:30

Image generated with Ai

As Sikkim prepares for the upcoming spring tourism season, the state government has introduced a Rs 50 entry fee for every tourist visiting the region. However, the move has sparked widespread criticism, with the Citizen Action Party Sikkim demanding an immediate rollback of the charge, citing concerns over its impact on local tourism and visitor footfall.

Despite the growing debate, state officials have not provided a detailed explanation for imposing the fee, leaving tourism stakeholders questioning its necessity.

CAP Sikkim Challenges the Tourist Entry Fee

Mahesh Rai, spokesperson for Citizen Action Party Sikkim, voiced concerns at a press conference, questioning why Indian citizens should pay an entry fee to visit a state within their own country. He compared the policy to Bhutan’s Sustainable Development Fund (SDF), which applies only to foreign tourists, but argued that Sikkim’s new rule unfairly targets domestic travelers.

“We will be collecting this fee from Indian citizens, which will negatively impact the tourism industry. There are already multiple taxes imposed on tourists,” Rai stated.

Citizen Action Party further criticized the government’s failure to address existing tourism infrastructure issues, pointing out that several permits and parking charges are already in place for visitors to North Sikkim, Silk Route, and Nathula Pass. Additionally, wildlife permits cost as much as Rs 100 per person, further increasing the financial burden on tourists.

Tourism Infrastructure Challenges in Sikkim

The lack of well-maintained tourism facilities has been a persistent issue in Sikkim. Citizen Action Party highlighted poor road connectivity, absence of 24-hour amenities, and inadequate drinking water and sanitation facilities on highways and at tourist hotspots.

“Many Indian states thrive on tourism-based economies. If visitors feel overburdened with fees and inadequate infrastructure in Sikkim, they will choose alternative destinations,” Rai warned.

Other challenges cited by tourism stakeholders include:

• Transport inefficiencies and high permit costs for traveling within Sikkim.
• Bribery issues for obtaining necessary permissions to return from Siliguri (West Bengal) with tourists.
• Post-pandemic tourism struggles, with local hotel owners facing low footfall and financial losses after investing heavily in hospitality infrastructure.

Post-COVID Recovery and the Future of Sikkim’s Tourism

Since COVID-19 disrupted travel to Sikkim, the region’s tourism sector has struggled to regain its pre-pandemic momentum. With fewer tourists returning, hoteliers and business owners who invested their life savings in the industry continue to face economic challenges.

The introduction of additional entry fees is seen as a barrier to recovery, deterring domestic travelers who may already be weighing alternative travel options.

Will Sikkim Reconsider the New Tourist Entry Fee?

The debate over the Rs 50 tourist entry fee is ongoing, with growing calls for policy revisions to ensure that tourism in Sikkim remains accessible and competitive. Whether the government reconsiders or revises the charge will likely determine the state’s ability to attract visitors in 2025 and beyond.