Published on November 21, 2025

Despite being only 250 miles apart, the cities of Dallas and Houston are separated by more than just distance. For contributor Benton Graham, the journey between these two Texas cities by train became a lesson in the complexities and inefficiencies that characterize much of the U.S. rail system today. What should have been a straightforward trip took Graham an exhausting 23 hours, a time that was extended further by an eight-hour layover in San Antonio, a detour that had nothing to do with convenience. Ironically, Google Maps suggests that the trip would have been quicker by bike.
This delay is indicative of a much larger issue within the American passenger rail system. For decades, rail networks in the U.S. have seen declining ridership and budget cuts, which have hindered the development of an efficient and timely rail network. In fact, Dallas and Houston have not had a direct Amtrak connection since 1995, leaving travelers like Graham to deal with inefficient and fragmented service routes.
Advertisement
The Texas rail network is one of many across the U.S. that has struggled to keep up with modern transportation demands. Over the years, the Amtrak service between Dallas and Houston was cut, and now the journey must be routed through San Antonio, which adds unnecessary delays. This route is not only long and cumbersome, but it also stands as a symbol of the broader issues that the U.S. passenger rail system faces.
Many Americans, like Graham, have had to endure similar experiences—longer travel times, uncomfortable transfers, and more time spent waiting. This inefficient network has led many to question the effectiveness of train travel in the country, especially when compared to other forms of transportation such as flying or driving.
The slow pace of progress in improving passenger rail service across the U.S. can be traced to political factors. Over the years, various states and regions have struggled to prioritize rail over highways and air travel. In the case of Texas, the lack of a direct rail connection between Dallas and Houston highlights the state’s longstanding preference for road infrastructure, often to the detriment of rail.
There are also issues with the way politics shape decisions about rail investments. Efforts to improve train speeds and efficiency are often thwarted by political opponents who see such investments as unnecessary or impractical. In Texas, where personal car ownership is deeply ingrained in the culture, there is little political will to expand or improve the train system, despite the potential benefits that more efficient rail travel could bring to the region.
Advertisement
One of the key reasons for the current state of passenger rail in Texas and other parts of the U.S. is the lack of sustained investment in rail infrastructure. While countries like Japan and France have made significant strides in developing high-speed rail systems, the U.S. has lagged behind in modernizing its network. Amtrak, the nation’s largest rail operator, has faced financial struggles for years, which has made it difficult to maintain and upgrade the existing infrastructure.
In Texas, the absence of a direct rail line between Dallas and Houston is just one example of how the lack of infrastructure investment has resulted in a fragmented and inefficient system. Even though Amtrak operates in the state, it does so with limited routes that do not meet the needs of the growing population. A lack of funding and political support has left Texas behind in terms of rail service, with no immediate plans for improvements.
Despite the numerous challenges, there is a silver lining for those who choose to travel by rail in Texas. Graham noted that while the journey was lengthy and inefficient, it did provide him with an opportunity to socialize and interact with fellow travelers. This aspect of rail travel—where passengers have the chance to converse, relax, and enjoy a slower pace of life—is something that has been largely lost with air travel and even car travel. In a world where much of travel is solitary or rushed, the train offers a unique opportunity for human connection.
For those who appreciate the social and scenic elements of travel, Texas by train offers an experience that cannot be replicated by other modes of transport. While the journey may not be the most efficient or time-effective, the sense of community and shared experience among passengers is something that remains integral to the train’s charm.
Looking ahead, the future of passenger rail in Texas remains uncertain. There is a growing push for more modern and efficient rail systems in several states, particularly in the Northeast Corridor, where Amtrak plays a critical role in connecting cities like New York, Boston, and Washington D.C. However, Texas remains largely resistant to embracing rail as a viable mode of transportation.
In recent years, there have been discussions about improving rail infrastructure in Texas, including proposals for high-speed trains that could cut travel times significantly. However, these projects often face delays due to funding issues, political resistance, and logistical hurdles. Texas is a large state with vast distances between cities, and the idea of developing a comprehensive rail network that spans the entire state faces significant challenges.
Despite the hurdles, there are advocates pushing for more rail investment in Texas. These advocates argue that expanding the rail network could help alleviate congestion on highways, reduce the state’s carbon footprint, and provide a more sustainable travel option for residents and visitors alike.
When comparing the U.S. rail system to other countries, the contrast becomes clear. Japan, for instance, boasts one of the most efficient and advanced high-speed rail systems in the world. The Shinkansen, or bullet train, is known for its punctuality, speed, and comfort, with trains regularly running at speeds of up to 200 miles per hour. Similarly, France’s TGV trains offer rapid transit between cities and have become the gold standard for high-speed rail worldwide.
In these countries, rail is not just an alternative to air or car travel; it is often the preferred mode of transport for long-distance journeys. The infrastructure is well-developed, and the political will to support and invest in rail systems is strong. This has allowed for the creation of rail networks that provide fast, reliable, and efficient service to millions of people.
In contrast, the U.S. rail system has largely been left behind. While Amtrak does provide some level of service, the network is limited, and the trains are often slower and less comfortable than those found in other countries. As Benton Graham’s experience demonstrates, Texas and other states have a long way to go before they can offer the kind of rail service that is commonplace in countries like Japan and France.
The journey from Dallas to Houston by train highlights the challenges faced by the U.S. rail system, especially in Texas, where inefficiency, political resistance, and a lack of infrastructure investment have hindered the growth of passenger rail. While there are efforts to improve rail service, they are often delayed or blocked by political factors, leaving travelers to contend with outdated and inconvenient routes.
However, despite these challenges, rail travel in Texas still offers unique experiences that cannot be found with other modes of transportation. For those willing to endure the long delays and less-than-ideal schedules, there is the opportunity to experience a slower, more social form of travel that fosters connections among passengers.
Looking forward, the future of rail in Texas depends on the willingness of both the government and the public to invest in and support the expansion of rail networks. With proper funding, political support, and strategic planning, Texas could one day become a model for efficient and sustainable rail travel in the U.S. However, it will take time, effort, and a shift in priorities to make that vision a reality.
Advertisement
Tags: Amtrak, Dallas, Houston, passenger rail, Public Transportation
Friday, November 21, 2025
Friday, November 21, 2025
Friday, November 21, 2025
Friday, November 21, 2025
Thursday, November 20, 2025
Thursday, November 20, 2025
Friday, November 21, 2025
Friday, November 21, 2025