US Travel Ban Targets Twelve Nations Including Iran, Libya, and Yemen Amid Rising Security Concerns All You Need to Know About the Sweeping Entry Restrictions

Published on June 5, 2025

A Significant Shift in U.S. Travel Rules Begins This June

In a dramatic transformation of its immigration framework, the United States has revealed a far-reaching set of travel restrictions that will come into force on June 9. This new directive, announced just days earlier on June 4, introduces a complete entry ban on citizens from twelve countries, alongside tightened visa controls for individuals from seven other nations. According to U.S. officials, the move addresses growing anxieties about national security threats and the inadequacy of international vetting systems.

Full Travel Ban: Complete Entry Prohibition for Twelve Countries

The newly enforced full ban applies to the following twelve nations:

• Afghanistan
• Myanmar
• Chad
• Republic of the Congo
• Equatorial Guinea
• Eritrea
• Haiti
• Iran
• Libya
• Somalia
• Sudan
• Yemen

Individuals from these countries will not be allowed to enter the United States under any form of visa—be it immigrant or non-immigrant. However, there are notable exceptions written into the policy. For example, green card holders, dual citizens using passports from unrestricted nations, and diplomatic personnel with appropriate visas are not impacted by the ban.

Also exempt are athletes and coaching staff who are scheduled to take part in international sporting events, such as the Olympic Games or the FIFA World Cup. These exemptions aim to limit unintended consequences while maintaining the core objective of protecting national interests.

Partial Restrictions for Seven Countries

In contrast to the full ban, seven countries face partial travel restrictions. These include:

• Burundi
• Cuba
• Laos
• Sierra Leone
• Togo
• Turkmenistan
• Venezuela

Citizens of these countries may still apply for specific types of visas, notably business (B-1), tourism (B-2), student (F/M), and exchange program (J) visas. However, applicants will be subject to more intensive screening. This can include submitting extra documentation, attending in-person interviews at embassies or consulates, and facing shortened visa durations.

These precautions reflect concerns about limited data sharing and insufficient background verification practices in the listed countries. The U.S. government intends for these added layers to ensure that only those who pose no risk are allowed entry.

Who Is Still Allowed to Travel?

While the new restrictions are sweeping, certain categories of travelers remain eligible for entry under specific conditions:

• Lawful Permanent Residents (Green Card Holders): Individuals holding permanent resident status in the U.S. can continue to travel freely.
• Dual Nationals: Travelers holding a passport from an unrestricted country may enter using that valid document.
• Diplomatic and Official Travelers: Those with official, diplomatic, or NATO visas are not included in the restrictions.
• Athletes and Coaches: Participants in high-profile, sanctioned international sporting events can apply for travel clearance.
• Humanitarian and Refugee Applicants: Individuals seeking asylum, refugee protection, or relief under the Convention Against Torture may be eligible for waivers, provided they demonstrate extreme hardship or humanitarian need.

Each exemption or waiver is handled on a case-by-case basis, and travelers must present compelling evidence to support their applications.

Why the Restrictions Were Imposed

Officials have pointed to persistent and rising security threats as the foundation for these new policies. According to the U.S. government, the twelve banned nations have insufficient vetting capabilities, meaning they are unable to verify or share necessary information on individuals applying to enter the United States.

A recent violent incident in Boulder, Colorado, was cited as an example of the danger posed when people from certain countries are not properly screened. Officials believe this policy overhaul will serve as a strong barrier against potential terrorist activity or other serious threats, thereby enhancing the safety of American citizens.

Global Consequences and Broader Impact

These changes are expected to trigger a domino effect across multiple sectors on a global scale. The implications go far beyond border control and may significantly alter how people move, do business, and study across borders.

1. Tourism Setback

Tourist arrivals from the banned countries are likely to plummet, which could affect revenue and hinder cultural exchange efforts. The tourism industry may also feel the pressure of increased scrutiny for travelers from restricted nations.

2. Economic and Trade Disruption

Professionals from restricted countries may now find it impossible to enter the U.S. for business-related purposes. This could slow down international partnerships, investments, and commercial negotiations.

3. Higher Education Barrier

Universities in the U.S., known for their diverse student populations, may see a decline in enrollments from affected countries. The outcome could include a drop in tuition revenues and a less international academic environment.

4. Diplomatic Fallout

The decision could also create tension in international relations. Some foreign governments may interpret the restrictions as discriminatory or politically motivated, possibly leading to diplomatic rifts or even reciprocal measures.

5. Humanitarian Setbacks

The path to safety for asylum seekers, refugees, and at-risk populations becomes narrower with such restrictions. Human rights groups may raise concerns about the ethical implications of leaving vulnerable individuals without viable options for protection.

A Defining Moment for Global Mobility

The enforcement of these restrictions marks a critical turning point in how the United States engages with global travelers. Framed as a tool to safeguard national interests, the policy introduces new complexities into the fabric of international movement.

While some view these changes as a necessary step toward enhancing security, others warn of the divisive consequences and human costs that could follow. In the months to come, travelers, global leaders, and institutions alike will need to adapt to a new landscape shaped by caution, rigor, and uncertainty.