TTW
TTW

Philippines, Malaysia and More Turns ASEAN Heritage Parks Into 30×30 Conservation Powerhouses Through Ecotourism

Asean heritage parks ecotourism

Image generated with Ai

Image Credit: ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity

Throughout Southeast Asia, protected natural areas are being transformed from neglected parks into dynamic ecological resources. Given that there is an international commitment to protect thirty percent of lands and oceans by the year 2030, the business side of travel needs to finance habitat protection, not just its own business expenses. The ASEAN Heritage Parks ecotourism concessions are facilitating new forms of public-private partnerships, utilizing commercial investments in order to finance landscapes.
User fees, capped numbers of visitors, and indigenous equity mechanisms, which are part of the concession arrangements, could help guarantee the preservation of critically biodiverse tropical ecosystems for future generations.

Policy and Regulatory Frameworks Governing 30×30 Integration

The adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) established Target 3, widely recognized as the 30×30 target. This international mandate requires nation-states to ensure that at least 30 percent of terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine areas are effectively conserved and sustainably managed by 2030. For member nations of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), achieving Target 3 requires a departure from traditional state-funded conservation models. Historically, protected areas across Southeast Asia faced chronic budget deficits, creating “paper parks”—reserves that existed on administrative maps but lacked the financial resources, personnel, and operational infrastructure required to stop illegal logging, agricultural encroachment, and poaching.

Under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, ASEAN member states are integrating commercial tourism directly into protected area governance. Rather than treating commercial operators as external threats to be excluded, national policy updates position private tour companies, eco-lodge developers, and hospitality chains as legally bound partners in long-term landscape stewardship. Under this paradigm, eco-concession licensing frameworks condition commercial access on verified contributions to habitat restoration, species monitoring, and site security.

Public-Private Partnership Regulations and Tenurial Agreements

The operationalization of commercial tourism within protected zones relies on structured public-private partnership (PPP) legislation and formal tenurial instruments. In the Philippines, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) regulates commercial operations within protected landscapes through the Special Use Agreement in Protected Areas (SAPA). Governed by DENR Administrative Order (DAO) No. 2007-17, DAO No. 2008-26, and updated policies, SAPA provides private concessionaires with secure long-term tenure—typically 25 years, renewable for an additional 25 years—to construct and operate low-impact ecotourism infrastructure in designated management zones.

Advertisement

Advertisement

To ensure commercial activity does not degrade primary forest or core wildlife habitats, SAPA applicants must satisfy rigorous environmental compliance requirements:

In Malaysia and Vietnam, statutory frameworks similarly regulate commercial activities inside national parks and reserves. The Malaysian federal government, working alongside state bodies such as the Sarawak Forestry Corporation (SFC) and the Pahang Department of Wildlife and National Parks, issues specialized ecotourism permits that restrict heavy infrastructure to peripheral buffer zones while reserving core wilderness for micro-guided research and low-impact trekking. In Vietnam, the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment (MAE) and the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Agency (NBCA) oversee ecotourism leases within Special Use Forests, requiring private partners to co-finance community forest guard cooperatives and biological monitoring teams.

Regional Governance: The Role of the ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity

Regional oversight and standardization of these commercial models are driven by the ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity (ACB). Functioning as the Secretariat for the ASEAN Heritage Parks Programme, the ACB coordinates member states to validate, monitor, and expand the AHP network, which encompasses 69 designated parks across the 10 ASEAN member countries as of late 2025.

During major ministerial convenings, including the 18th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting on the Environment (AMME-18) in Langkawi, Malaysia, and the 8th ASEAN Heritage Parks Conference (AHP 8) in Quang Ninh, Vietnam, the ACB validated multiple newly nominated protected areas. The ACB evaluates nominated sites against rigorous biological and administrative metrics. To achieve and maintain AHP status, a reserve must demonstrate high ecological completeness, host species of regional or global conservation significance, and execute management plans incorporating Nature-based Solutions (NbS). The ACB continuously monitors designated sites to ensure that national protected area status translates into active ecological management supported by ring-fenced conservation fees and transparent public-private partnerships.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Business Models and Financial Ring-Fencing Mechanisms

Transitioning commercial tourism into a perpetual engine for conservation finance requires institutional mechanisms that prevent revenues from being diverted into general state budgets. Historically, entrance and activity fees collected at state natural parks flowed directly into national central treasuries, leaving park superintendents dependent on unpredictable annual budgetary allocations.

Ring-Fencing Conservation Revenues: The IPAF and PA-RIA Models

To establish financial autonomy for protected landscapes, ASEAN nations are instituting legislative frameworks that ring-fence eco-tourism revenues. A primary model is the Philippines’ Integrated Protected Area Fund (IPAF), established under the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) Act of 1992 (Republic Act No. 7586) and amended by the Expanded NIPAS Act of 2018 (Republic Act No. 11038).

Under the RA 11038 framework, revenues generated within individual protected areas—including commercial user levies, entrance fees, SAPA development payments, and resource usage tariffs—are allocated through a dual-account structure:

By ring-fencing 75 percent of commercial receipts for direct local reinvestment, the PA-RIA framework ensures that growth in tourism activity directly expands local frontline conservation budgets. In commercial practice, hotel chains, inbound tour operators, and liveaboard vessels collect mandatory conservation fees directly from guests, remitting these funds into PA-RIA accounts to maintain financial transparency.

Eco-Concession Licensing: High-Yield, Low-Impact Tourism Rights

The commercial framework inside AHP biodiversity corridors relies on granting exclusive, low-impact, high-yield concession rights to qualified operators. Open-access mass tourism models prioritize volume, which leads to trail degradation, unauthorized land clearing, waste management failures, and wildlife disturbance. In contrast, 30×30 aligned concession models substitute volume for value by establishing strict carrying-capacity caps while introducing mandatory conservation surcharges.

Concessionaires operating under these high-yield frameworks must adhere to structured operational standards:

Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) Equity and Co-Management

Sustainable ecotourism concessions must integrate resident populations into project governance and economic sharing. The Public-Private-People Partnerships (4P) model expands traditional PPP frameworks by establishing Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs) as formal equity partners in ecotourism ventures.

In the Philippines, where protected landscapes overlap with Ancestral Domains recognized under the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act of 1997 (IPRA / Republic Act No. 8371), commercial operators must obtain Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) before executing SAPA tenurial agreements. This legal requirement establishes binding royalty-sharing agreements, guarantees preferential hiring of local indigenous guides, and integrates customary tribal governance into trail management and spatial zoning. In Malaysia and Vietnam, local community members are integrated as certified heritage guides, botanical experts, and paid members of community forest guard cooperatives, ensuring commercial travel yields tangible local economic security.

Asean heritage parks ecotourism

Image generated with Ai

Image Credit: ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity

Strategic Paradigm Shift: Operational Metrics Comparison

The transition from conventional mass ecotourism to a 30×30 aligned AHP concession model represents a structural shift in operational priorities, financial tracking, and environmental governance.

Operational DimensionTraditional Mass Ecotourism30×30 Aligned AHP Eco-Concession Model
Primary KPIVisitor arrival numbers, gross room nights, and hotel occupancy rates.Ecosystem health index, key species population trends, carrying-capacity compliance, and habitat connectivity.
Revenue Stream & Ring-FencingGeneral entrance fees remitted to central treasuries; delayed, diluted budgetary re-allocations.Earmarked conservation levies and SAPA fees deposited directly into ring-fenced accounts (e.g., 75% PA-RIA retention).
Operator InvolvementPassive user of public natural assets with minimal accountability for environmental degradation.Active conservation partner bound by tenurial contracts to fund ranger patrols, scientific surveys, and habitat restoration.
Community Role & EquityLow-wage service personnel, drivers, informal souvenir vendors, and external service providers.Equity partners, co-managers within 4P frameworks, certified indigenous heritage guides, and direct royalty recipients.
Ecological Governance & EnforcementUnregulated open-access travel; sporadic municipal oversight; reactive enforcement against illegal activities.Strict spatial zoning; real-time carrying-capacity enforcement; continuous biological monitoring validated by ACB protocols.

Operational Profiles of Emerging ASEAN Heritage Parks

Examining specific emerging, newly designated, and candidate ASEAN Heritage Parks illustrates how these commercial concession and financing models operate across distinct regional landscapes.

Philippines: Pre-emptive Zoning and Watershed Concessions

Mount Balatukan Range Natural Park (Misamis Oriental)

Located in Misamis Oriental, the Mount Balatukan Range Natural Park is an active candidate site for ASEAN Heritage Park designation. The park encompasses a massive volcanic complex that serves as a vital watershed corridor for Northern Mindanao and the traditional ancestral domain of the Higa-onon indigenous tribe.

Because commercial tourism infrastructure in Mount Balatukan is still in its early stages, the DENR and local municipal authorities are implementing pre-emptive concession planning:

Mount Inayawan Range Natural Park (Lanao del Norte)

Designated as ASEAN Heritage Park #53 in 2023, Mount Inayawan Range Natural Park covers 4,236 hectares and is recognized as the “green heart” of Lanao del Norte. The park features pristine primary rainforests ranging from lowland dipterocarp to high-elevation mossy forests, functioning as a critical refuge for the critically endangered Philippine Eagle (Pithecophaga jefferyi).

To align commercial travel with bird conservation objectives:

Pasonanca Natural Park (Zamboanga City)

Designated as ASEAN Heritage Park #52, Pasonanca Natural Park spans over 12,000 hectares of old-growth forest situated immediately adjacent to urban Zamboanga City. It protects one of the oldest municipal watershed reserves in the Philippines, supplying drinking water to the surrounding metropolitan population.

Pasonanca serves as a primary test bed for municipal watershed eco-concessions:

Malaysia: Botanical Micro-Concessions and Tiger-Corridor Protection

Lambir Hills National Park (Sarawak)

Formally onboarded into the ASEAN Heritage Park network in late 2025 (with site operational integration beginning in September 2025), Lambir Hills National Park in northern Sarawak is internationally recognized as a global hotspot for plant diversity and endemism. Despite covering a compact land area of 6,952 hectares, Lambir Hills hosts one of the highest concentrations of tree species in the Palaeotropics. Notably, the park harbors more than half of all fig (Ficus) species recorded across the island of Borneo, sustaining complex wildlife trophic networks that support eight distinct hornbill species, the great argus, banded leaf monkey, red leaf monkey, and western tarsier.

The concession strategy at Lambir Hills focuses on botanical micro-concessions:

Tengku Hassanal Wildlife Reserve (Pahang)

Officially designated as an ASEAN Heritage Park at the 18th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting on the Environment (AMME-18) in late 2025, the Tengku Hassanal Wildlife Reserve in Pahang represents one of Peninsular Malaysia’s largest protected areas. The reserve encompasses primary rainforest corridors essential for the survival of the critically endangered Malayan Tiger (Panthera tigris jacksoni), Asian Elephant, and Malayan Tapir.

The park is pioneering strictly regulated tiger-corridor safari concessions:

Vietnam: Transboundary Habitat Restoration and Wetland Preservation

Pi Mát National Park (Nghệ An Province)

Recognized as an ASEAN Heritage Park at AMME-18 and formally awarded its certification at the 8th AHP Conference in Quang Ninh in December 2025, Pi Mát National Park spans over 94,000 hectares in Nghệ An Province. As the core zone of the Western Nghe An Biosphere Reserve along the Annamite Range, Pi Mát protects forest corridors bordering Laos and harbors rare endemic species, including the critically endangered Saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis) and the Annamite Striped Rabbit.

Pi Mát’s ecotourism framework integrates community livelihoods with transboundary protection:

Đồng Nai Culture and Nature Reserve (Đồng Nai Province)

Designated as an ASEAN Heritage Park in late 2025, the Đồng Nai Culture and Nature Reserve covers over 100,000 hectares of inland wetlands and tropical forests surrounding the Tri An reservoir. The reserve maintains a dual mandate: protecting endangered species such as the Asian Elephant and Indochinese Silvered Langur while preserving historical revolution sites and local cultural heritage.

The reserve’s concession model demonstrates cultural-natural integration:

Asean heritage parks ecotourism

Image generated with Ai

Image Credit: ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity

Industry Impact, Economic Implications, and Risk Mitigation

The transition to 30×30 aligned ecotourism concessions imposes clear operational obligations on commercial travel companies while opening up valuable long-term market opportunities.

Investor Certainty and ESG Alignment

For hospitality developers, inbound tour operators, and global travel conglomerates, securing a long-term concession in an ASEAN Heritage Park provides regulatory and operational certainty:

Operational Costs vs Long-Term Asset Enhancement

While compliance with carrying-capacity limits and zonal development fees increases initial operational expenditures, the long-term economic returns of low-impact, high-yield concessions often exceed those of mass tourism models:

Strategic Outlook and Regional Roadmaps Towards 2030

As Southeast Asian nations work toward their 2030 biodiversity commitments, the regional framework governing ASEAN Heritage Parks will continue to mature. The upcoming roadmap includes key milestones:

By tying private enterprise to strict ecological outcomes, ring-fenced conservation accounts, and local community co-management, ASEAN Heritage Parks demonstrate how commercial tourism can actively drive biodiversity preservation. This evolving concession model provides a practical blueprint for aligning economic activity with the global imperative to protect 30 percent of the Earth’s natural systems by 2030.

Conclusion

Integration of commercial travel within the framework of the global 30×30 agenda heralds the dawn of a new age in environmental management of Southeast Asia. The ASEAN Heritage Park concept illustrates the idea that conservation of natural habitats does not have to sacrifice its economic sustainability. With the help of enforceable public-private partnerships, designated conservation funds and indigenous co-management, the commercial touristic industry becomes a driver of ecological regeneration processes. The development of new heritage parks in the region calls for compliance with strict concession terms which will ensure financing of rangers’ activities and biodiversity monitoring on an ongoing basis.

Advertisement

Share On:

Advertisement

Advertisement

Gtranslate

PARTNERS

@

Subscribe to our Newsletters

I want to receive travel news and trade event updates from Travel And Tour World. I have read Travel And Tour World's Privacy Notice .